Solo Institute

← All articles

Insight 02

From Business Continuity to Climate Adaptation: Same Muscle, New Scenarios

Topic
Resilience + Climate Risk
Type
Practical methodology
Date
2026-Q1
Author
Solo Institute
From Business Continuity to Climate Adaptation: Same Muscle, New ScenariosInsight 02

Summary

Many organisations have spent decades building business continuity plans (BCP) under ISO 22301. Now the same organisations are obliged, under TCFD and CSRD pressure, to prepare climate adaptation plans.

In most cases the two efforts are independent — often run by different teams — which wastes both cost and discipline.

We propose a practical bridge that extends the BCP muscle with climate scenarios.

Key points

  • BCP and climate adaptation ask the same core question: "If this event happens, how does the organisation stay up?"
  • Difference: BCP works with known scenarios (fire, cyber, pandemic); climate adaptation works with high-uncertainty, long-horizon scenarios.
  • Solution: extend the BIA (Business Impact Analysis) module of BCP with climate scenarios.

Section 1 — Three Bridge Points

Bridge 1: BIA → Climate-BIA. The existing BIA already defines critical processes, RTO/RPO and impact categories. Climate scenarios (flood, drought, heat wave, cold wave) are added to the same structure.

Bridge 2: Scenario test → Climate simulation. Existing tabletop and functional exercise methodology is applied with climate scenarios. Instead of "8-hour power cut," the scenario becomes "3-day heat wave + loss of cooling capacity."

Bridge 3: Supplier map → Climate-vulnerable supply chain. The existing supplier criticality map is overlaid with geographic climate risk data.

Section 2 — Practical Steps

  1. Inventory the current BCP (last update, scope, last exercise)
  2. List the TCFD/IFRS S2 physical risk scenarios (IPCC regional projection)
  3. Extend the BIA module for each scenario
  4. Build an ROI framework for adaptation investment
  5. Define an exercise calendar (at least 1 climate scenario per year)
  6. Disclose BCP + adaptation integration in the sustainability report

Section 3 — Common Problems

BCP team and sustainability team speak different languages
Shared terminology workshop (3 hours)
Climate data is too generic
Switch to site-specific data sources (IPCC, WRI Aqueduct, national projections)
Insufficient evidence for the investment decision
Produce Climate VaR + ROI table together
Old exercises are seen as boring
Climate scenarios bring new adrenaline to exercises

Conclusion

Rather than writing a new plan, opening the existing plan to next-generation scenarios is the right starting point for most organisations. Solo Institute combines ISO 22301 and climate frameworks to build that bridge.

Solo Institute offers a 6-week integration programme for organisations that want to turn their existing BCP into a climate adaptation muscle.

Work with us